Yingling Aircraft, Inc. v. Budde
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, District Judge.
A recovery herein is sought on three promissory notes made payable to plaintiff, which were executed October 1,1958, by defendant. These have a total value of $10,500.00 and represent part of a group of renewal notes, some of which have not yet matured. Defendant does not deny the execution of the notes but contends that the original transaction giving rise to the signing of the present renewal notes was tainted by economic duress or business compulsion, that by reason of this fact the present instruments are not enforceable.
The plaintiff has moved for summary judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Vines v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. GormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Starks v. FieldWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Manhattan Milling Co. v. Manhattan Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. McBrideDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Avco Financial Services, Inc. v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978