Legal Opinion

Callison v. Dondero

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1942No. Civ. 6751PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, Acting P. J.

The defendant, Charles Dondero, has appealed from a judgment of $1,981, which was rendered pursuant to the verdict of a jury, jointly against him and his co-defendant, D. K. Adams, as damages resulting from an automobile casualty. No appeal was perfected in behalf of the defendant, Adams.

It is contended the verdict and judgment are not supported by the evidence; that the appellant was free from negligence; that the plaintiff’s driver of the truck which was involved in the accident was guilty of contributory negligence; that the conduct of Adams, who was the driver of a third automobile which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scoville v. KeglorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Casey v. GritschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Cummings v. KendallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States of America, and Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Isaac MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. Thomson v. BaylessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Barone v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Rowe v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Stoltz v. ConverseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API