Callison v. Dondero
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, Acting P. J.
The defendant, Charles Dondero, has appealed from a judgment of $1,981, which was rendered pursuant to the verdict of a jury, jointly against him and his co-defendant, D. K. Adams, as damages resulting from an automobile casualty. No appeal was perfected in behalf of the defendant, Adams.
It is contended the verdict and judgment are not supported by the evidence; that the appellant was free from negligence; that the plaintiff’s driver of the truck which was involved in the accident was guilty of contributory negligence; that the conduct of Adams, who was the driver of a third automobile which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scoville v. KeglorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Casey v. GritschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Cummings v. KendallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States of America, and Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Isaac MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Thomson v. BaylessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Barone v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Rowe v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Stoltz v. ConverseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.