Legal Opinion
United States v. Deaner Tab Deaner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 29, 1993No. 92-7626PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
Tab R. Deaner (“Deaner”) appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his residence upon execution of a search warrant and the term of incarceration imposed on him by the Guidelines sentencing order the district court entered after Deaner’s conditional guilty plea. . We will affirm.
The district court had subject matter jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3231 (West 1985). This Court has appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 (West Supp.1993)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Paul N. Johnson Darryl Jonns Lamont Bell and Craig Richardson, Paul N. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Eric Lee JobsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Samuel Roman, A.K.A. Samuel Mercado Samuel Roman, United States of America v. Oscar Roman, A.K.A. Oscar MercadoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Ira HaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.