Legal Opinion

Holmgren v. Red Lake Falls Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1926No. 25,610PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff’s wife. After verdict for defendant, plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Mrs. Holmgren was injured by the fall of a manlift on which she was riding in defendant’s elevator at Badger, Minnesota, on a Sunday afternoon in August, 1922. The elevator was new and had been open for use but a short time. It was in charge of one Hegberg, defendant’s local manager. Plaintiff’s wife is a sister of Mrs. Heg-berg. On the Sunday in question it was not in operation nor open to the public for any purpose. Plaintiff, his wife…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barmore v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Slater v. Advance Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Loop v. . LitchfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Sweeden v. Atkinson Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Ingham Lumber Co. v. IngersollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lund v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. BunceWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Akerson v. D. C. Bates & Sons, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API