Scuderi v. Monumental Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This age discrimination/breach of employment contract action is presently before the Court on Defendant Monumental Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff has responded to Defendant’s Motion to which Response Defendant has replied. Having reviewed and considered the parties’ briefs and supporting documents and the entire record of this matter, the Court has determined that oral argument is not necessary. 1 Therefore, pursuant to Eastern District of Michigan Local…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lemanski v. REV Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Little v. AmeriHealth Caritas Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Patel v. Trinity Health CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Williams v. AK STEEL CORP.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020