Legal Opinion

Fielder v. Jessup

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1887PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, George W. Lubke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBombauer, J.

This is a proceeding of garnishment upon attachment, and was tried in the circuit court to which the cause had been appealed by the garnishee, upon the following agreed statement of facts:

‘ ‘ For the purpose of dispensing with all oral testimony touching the liability of the St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Bailroad Company, as garnishee, in the above entitled cause, it is agreed by and between the parties that the following are the facts bearing upon the case:

“1. It is admitted as true that the plaintiff, Wilfiam Fielder, and his assignees, were and now are nonresidents of the state of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Tingley v. BatemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Den v. HuffTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Osgood v. . MaguireNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wyeth Hardware & Manufacturing Co. v. H. F. Lang & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. State Ex Rel. Fielder v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. Wyeth Hardware & Manufacturing Co. v. H. F. Lang & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Keating v. American Refrigerator Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Todd v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API