Legal Opinion

Worland v. Davis

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1924No. 1082PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, District Judge.

The plaintiff in error Worland brought this action in the District Court of Fremont County against Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads. Thereafter, by stipulation, the name of the present defendant was substituted to meet the subsequent changes made officially in the office of Direct- or General of Ráilroads.

The suit was instituted on account of alleged negligence in failing to unload and properly feed and water a shipment of stock which left Waltman on August 1st about five o ’clock in the afternoon, billed to Fremont, Nebraska. The specific complaint was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. LampmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Marshall v. RuggWyoming Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Riordan v. HortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Wheaton v. RampackerWyoming Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Edwards v. MurrayWyoming Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wood v. Geis Trucking Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API