State v. Edwards
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the municipal court of Duluth, Windom, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and conviction of the offense set forth in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Upon the complaint of Charles F. Staples, a member of the State Railroad & Warehouse Commission, defendants, commission merchants doing business at Duluth, were charged with having violated the provisions of section 2, c. 225, p. 246, Daws 1899, in failing to render a true statement to the consignor concerning a consignment of flax. A plea of not guilty was entered, and the trial resulted in a verdict of guilty. The case is brought here upon appeal by defendants from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
It is undisputed that the consignor, Victor Carlson, resided at Ballock,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- State ex rel. Beek v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- State v. HeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Duluth Board of TradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- State v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. SharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State v. RepsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. LundgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.