Holt v. Nielson
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by Robert N. Holt against A. J. Neilson and another, copartners as Nielson & Kearnes. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
Respondent brought this action against the appellants to recover damages for their failure to deliver to him 300 head of buck sheep which respondent under the terms of a written agreement or bailment had delivered to appellants, and which agreement was set forth in full in the complaint, and, further, to recover damages for the value of certain wool which appellants had obtained from said sheep, and which it was alleged appellants had converted to their own use. In their answer appellants admitted the receipt of “300 head of rams” from respondent, and denied generally all the other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Salt Lake & Ogden Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
- Chicago & Aurora Railroad v. DunningIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- McHoney v. KerwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Mt. Olivet Cemetery Ass'n v. DaltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hork v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- State v. OversonUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Meza v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019