Legal Opinion

Twitty v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2009No. ED 92308PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Rodney Twitty (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Movant asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he established his plea counsel was ineffective for guaranteeing that Mov-ant would get probation in exchange for a blind Alford plea and for threatening Mov-ant with substantial time if he went to trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Twitty v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API