Gonzalez v. Richmond
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1058The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to vacate his default in appearing before the Supreme Court on June 4, 2008 (see Wong v Wong, 300 AD2d 473, 474 [2002]; Adams v Adams, 255 AD2d 535, 536 [1998]). “Although a party seeking to vacate a default must establish a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense, this Court has adopted a liberal policy with respect to vacating defaults in matrimonial actions” (Wong v Wong, 300 AD2d 473, 474 [2002]). Here, the defendant not only presented a reasonable excuse for his and his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ripa v. RipaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Adams v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Dellagatta v. McGillicuddyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Connolly v. ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Schlakman v. SchlakmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ito v. ItoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010