Legal Opinion

San Joaquin Light & Power Co. v. Barlow

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1919No. Civ. No. 2294PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Fred H. Taft, Judge.’ Judgment reversed; appeal from order denying new trial dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $655.20 upon a common count for the alleged reasonable value of electric current delivered by plaintiff to the defendant. From a judgment awarding the demanded sum of money the defendant appeals.

The plaintiff introduced in evidence certain correspondence between the parties, constituting a contract which authorized the plaintiff to deliver electricity and to charge therefor at a stated rate. The evidence further shows that a stated quantity of electric current was delivered, and that the amount due therefor, when computed in the manner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pastene v. PardiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Steward v. HinkelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Grossblatt v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Umphray v. HufschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API