Legal Opinion

Belote v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 1, 1933No. 15651Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

The state in a motion for rehearing says this court failed to pass upon the issue of diligence of appellant in pursuing his remedy to secure a statement of facts and refers us to Wood v. State, 67 Texas Crim. Rep., 609, 150 S. W., 194, in which it was said that although the trial judge may have made an order directing the court reporter to furnish an indigent defendant with a statement of facts, this court would not hold diligence sufficient unless the order was followed with mandamus proceeding against the reporter to compel compliance with the order. A…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Ex Parte FreadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Peddy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API