Lewis v. State

Sidney Lewis (“Appellant”) appeals his conviction and sentence for felony battery. He argues the trial court failed to conduct an adequate inquiry to determine whether his waiver of court-appointed counsel was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, as required by Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). He also argues the court erred when it failed to renew the offer of counsel prior to sentencing. We find the trial court satisfied Faretta and therefore did not abuse its discretion by permitting Appellant to represent himself at trial. See Aguirre-Jarquin v.…