Cleveland v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We deny Appellant’s motion for rehearing or certification of conflict. For purposes of clarification, we withdraw our previous opinion and substitute this opinion in its place.

Fred Antonio Cleveland, Jr. challenges his convictions and sentences for lewd or lascivious conduct by touching a person under sixteen years of age and for lewd or lascivious conduct by solicitation. Cleveland raises three arguments on appeal: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied Appellant’s motion for continuance; (2) whether the State failed to prove that he committed…