Legal Opinion
Greenblatt v. Gluck
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 3, 2003No. 03 Civ. 597(RWS)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se Martin Greenblatt (“Greenblatt”) has moved for reconsideration of the March 17, 2003 order dismissing his claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because Greenblatt has already filed an amended complaint in accordance with the March 17 order, and because defendant Robert W. Gluck (“Gluck”) asserts that the amended complaint should be dismissed pursuant to ■ Rules 12(b)(1) and (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue, Gluck’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint will also be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Amphion, Inc. v. Buckeye Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Kelly Services, Inc. v. NorettoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Boehner v. HeiseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Ferrand v. Credit LyonnaisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Morgan v. North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.