Legal Opinion
Severinsen v. Widener University
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 14, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
768 A.2d 200 (2001)
338 N.J. Super. 42
Gregory T. SEVERINSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WIDENER UNIVERSITY and Widener University School of Law, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 22, 2001.
Decided March 14, 2001.
Appellant argued his cause pro se.
Donald R. Nichols, Livingston, argued the cause for respondent (Goetz, Nichols, Hereforth & Conchar, attorneys; Mr. Nichols, of counsel and on the brief).
Before Judges BAIME, WALLACE, Jr.[1] and CARCHMAN.
The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, P.J.A.D.
The question presented by this appeal is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dorothy Bearry v. Beech Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Christie v. National Institute for Newman StudiesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Division of Youth and Family Services v. MYJPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- MURRAY v. JOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Morgan v. Confidential Services Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2002