Legal Opinion
Stand Up for California! v. U.S. Department of the Interior
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 29, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-2039PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs bring this consolidated action, under the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 461, et seq., the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551, et seq., the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701, et seq., and the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321, et seq., to challenge the decision of the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior to acquire a 305-acre parcel of land in Madera County, California in trust on behalf of the intervenor-defendant North Fork Ranchería of Mono Indians and…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gulf Restoration Network v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Stand Up for California! v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Stand Up for California! v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- In Re: Navy ChaplaincyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Defenders of Wildlife v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.