Legal Opinion

State v. Vice

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1994No. A-93-033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Connolly, Judge.

Rodney E. Vice appeals his conviction for making terroristic threats and the determination that he was a habitual criminal on grounds that the prosecution for terroristic threats subjected him to double jeopardy. Vice previously had been convicted of violating a protection order. That conviction was based on the same incident from which the prosecution for terroristic threats arose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court because we cannot determine from the record whether the offense for which Vice was convicted in the terroristic threats proceeding consisted of the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Otey v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  2. State v. SchmidtNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API