Jakstys v. Jakstys
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
The sole issue on appeal is whether no-fault grounds for divorce survive the non pros of a divorce action for failure to file a bill of particulars. We hold that a bill of particulars is not required in a no-fault divorce action. According ly, we reverse the order of the court below and remand for a full hearing on appellant’s petition for alimony pendente lite, counsel fees and costs.
The parties were married on September 28, 1963, and are currently separated. On May 8, 1981, appellant-wife, Millicent L. Jakstys, filed a Complaint in Divorce based on §§ 201(a)(6) (indignities),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Gordon v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Babcock, Cornish & Co. v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Cantwell v. CantwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Estate of EasterdaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Restifo v. RestifoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Gibson v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988