Legal Opinion

Jakstys v. Jakstys

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1984No. 2512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

The sole issue on appeal is whether no-fault grounds for divorce survive the non pros of a divorce action for failure to file a bill of particulars. We hold that a bill of particulars is not required in a no-fault divorce action. According ly, we reverse the order of the court below and remand for a full hearing on appellant’s petition for alimony pendente lite, counsel fees and costs.

The parties were married on September 28, 1963, and are currently separated. On May 8, 1981, appellant-wife, Millicent L. Jakstys, filed a Complaint in Divorce based on §§ 201(a)(6) (indignities),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Gordon v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Babcock, Cornish & Co. v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Cantwell v. CantwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of EasterdaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Restifo v. RestifoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Gibson v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API