Legal Opinion
United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 17, 1990No. CIV-79-990CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CURTIN, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
The Niagara County Health Department (“NCHD”) was originally named as a defendant by plaintiff United States of America (“United States”). According to the original complaint, dated December 20, 1979, the NCHD was named as a defendant “only to insure that the remedial measures requested by plaintiff can be fully implemented, if necessary, by the County Health Department’s power of entry to suppress or remove.” Item 1 at ¶ 12. In the United States’ second amended complaint, dated December 8, 1983, the NCHD was not named as a defendant. See Item 141.
In its…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Idylwoods Associates v. Mader Capital, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Warwick Administrative Group v. Avon Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- State of NY v. SCA Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- United States v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.