Legal Opinion

Frank Gomez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1968No. 22033_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

Frank R. Gomez, in federal custody under a judgment of conviction and sentence for violation of the narcotic laws, applied to the district court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1964), to vacate the judgment of conviction and the plea of guilty, and afford him a new opportunity to plead to the indictment. The district court denied the application without granting Gomez a hearing and he took this appeal.

On March 25, 1959, Gomez was charged, in counts 2 and 3 of a threeccsmt indictment, with the sale of narcotics in violation of 68A Stat. 551 (1954), 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Anthony Joseph Munich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. George Richard Heiden, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Richard Castro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pettaway v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Robert Woodward, A/K/A Robert Woodard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Kermit Nello Burton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. Phillip Lee Tannehill v. Cletus J. Fitzharris, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Arthur Reed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API