Legal Opinion

Lowry v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 11, 2008No. 26436PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

In this case, the PCR court found that a supplemental jury charge on felony murder did not violate Petitioner’s due process rights, and therefore, that Petitioner’s counsel was not ineffective in failing to object to the charge. This Court granted certiorari to review the PCR court’s decision. Because we find that the charge unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof for malice in Petitioner’s murder conviction, we reverse.

Factual/Procedural Background

A grand jury indicted Petitioner Joseph Lowry (“Petitioner”) for murder, possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BelcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. LivermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API