Sherman v. Provident American Insurance Company
Texas Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
NORVELL, Justice.
The judgment in this case is not based upon the merits of the controversy. There is a genuine issue of fact as to whether the insurance policy sued upon had been procured by false representations as to the health of Mrs. Sherman. Although a jury had been impanelled, this issue was never submitted to it nor decided by the trial court. I realize that we must have procedural rules, and that upon occasion lawsuits will be determined by how lawyers use or fail to utilize these rules. However, the rendition of a judgment not based upon the merits of a controversy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. v. BerglundTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Rhea v. HackneySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Lang v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Green v. HallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.