Legal Opinion

Greengard v. Katz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1933No. Gen. No. 36,336PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Complainant brought a suit to foreclose a trust deed executed by Louis Katz and his wife, on a 99-year leasehold given to secure their promissory notes in the aggregate sum of $65,000, some of which notes had been paid. The defense interposed was that the transaction was usurious in that the defendants had received only $50,000 for the notes aggregating $65,000. The case was referred to a master who found that the defense of usury was unavailable, and recommended a decree of foreclosure as prayed for in the bill. The amount he found to be due, which included principal, interest, insurance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Merchants Exchange National Bank v. Commercial Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Crawford v. NimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Andres v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Baker v. SalzensteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Thompson v. CrainsIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kosmerl v. SevinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  2. Silver v. Michelle Gardens, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1963
  3. Plaza Express Co. v. Middle States Motor Freight, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API