Greengard v. Katz
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Complainant brought a suit to foreclose a trust deed executed by Louis Katz and his wife, on a 99-year leasehold given to secure their promissory notes in the aggregate sum of $65,000, some of which notes had been paid. The defense interposed was that the transaction was usurious in that the defendants had received only $50,000 for the notes aggregating $65,000. The case was referred to a master who found that the defense of usury was unavailable, and recommended a decree of foreclosure as prayed for in the bill. The amount he found to be due, which included principal, interest, insurance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Merchants Exchange National Bank v. Commercial Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Crawford v. NimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Andres v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1900
- Baker v. SalzensteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Thompson v. CrainsIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kosmerl v. SevinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- Silver v. Michelle Gardens, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1963
- Plaza Express Co. v. Middle States Motor Freight, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963