Legal Opinion

Praggastis v. Clackamas County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 1987No. 84-3-107; CA A41362PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an action for negligence and breach of statutory duty under the Oregon Tort Claims Act. ORS 30.260 to 30.300. Plaintiff alleges that defendant’s employes and agents negligently failed to docket, as a judgment against her former husband, her divorce decree and accompanying property settlement agreement in accordance with ORS 18.320 and that, as a consequence, she lost the priority of her decree against her former husband’s property and was damaged in the amount of $100,000 when he filed for bankruptcy. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant on the grounds that the decree and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tolls v. TollsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Esselstyn v. CASTEELOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hagen v. HagenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Watson v. OdellUtah Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Praggastis v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API