Legal Opinion

United States v. Mandel

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 13, 1927No. 7234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The defendants in the above-entitled ease have been indicted for the illegal possession and manufacture of intoxicating liquors and for maintaining a common nuisance. Before trial they filed a motion to suppress evidence which the government. proposes to offer at the trial. This evidence will consist, in part, at least, of information gained by the federal agents as a result of search and seizure upon a search warrant, which, upon the authority of United States v. Roma, 17 F.(2d) 270 (decided in this court November 22, 1926), must be declared an invalid one, for the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SheltonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1945
  2. United States v. On LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. United States v. On LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API