United States v. Powell
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LUCAS, Judge:
Pursuant to his guilty pleas before a special court-martial, military judge alone, the appellant was found guilty of committing offenses relating to his failure to report to *639work on time and travel and housing allowance fraud.
We have examined the record of trial, the single assignment of error,1 and the Government’s response thereto. We have concluded that the findings and the sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.
The appellant contends that the trial judge committed plain error…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. AurichUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. GregoryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. YerichArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997