United States v. Malt
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
CANT, District Judge.
In this case the question proposed by the government for solution was whether the person owning the property in question had assembled the same and was offering it for sale, with the intent that it should be used in the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor. If the claim of the government in this- rc.speet was correct, the property should have been seized and confiscated and the owner punished. If not correct, the matter should have been so determined on the merits. Because of the very imperfect work done in connection with the attempted seizure, the court is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Meeker v. Winthrop Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1883
- Ghisolfo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. One OX-5 American Eagle AirplaneDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
- United States v. Two Soaking Units & Various Other ArticlesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
- United States v. 673 Cases of Distilled Spirits & WinesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946