Legal Opinion

Maricopa Turf, Inc. v. Sunmaster, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 3, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 91-0061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

A general contractor and its surety appeal from the grant of summary judgment enforcing a materialman’s claim against the general contractor’s payment bond. The general contractor posted the payment bond in connection with a school district construction project. The principal issue is whether a reference in the payment bond to the Little Miller Act incorporates the notice provisions of that Act and supersedes the otherwise applicable notice provisions of the State Board of Education Procurement Rules. A related issue is whether a materialman’s notice of claim against a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Long v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Porter v. EyerArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Continental Bank v. Wa-Ho Truck BrokerageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC v. Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. Fields v. CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API