Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Qualls

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1998No. COA97-702Published

1Dissent

Judge Greene

dissenting.

I disagree with the majority’s holding that the evidence is sufficient to support submission to the jury of the felonious child abuse charge and the second-degree murder charge. Otherwise, I agree with the majority.

In ruling on a motion to dismiss, the trial court is “to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State,” State v. Earnhardt, 307 N.C. 62, 67, 296 S.E.2d 649, 652-53 (1982) (citing State v. McKinney, 288 N.C. 113, 117, 215 S.E.2d 578, 581-82 (1975)), and determine “whether there is substantial evidence (a) of each essential element of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. LangSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API