Edward v. Knapp and Evelyn Mae Knapp v. Wabash Railroad Company, a Corporation, and Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
Appellants’ causes of action were dismissed upon motion of appellees for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the opening statement of appellants’ counsel. 1
In Best v. District of Columbia, 291 U.S. 411, 54 S.Ct. 487, 78 L.Ed. 882 (1934), the Supreme Court considered the propriety of granting a motion for a directed verdict upon the opening statement of plaintiff’s counsel. Chief Justice Hughes pertinently observed:
“There is no question as to the power of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant upon the opening statement of plaintiff’s counsel where…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Illinois Power & Light Corporation v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- Maybach v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peggy Ann Morfeld v. Dennis J. Kehm, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Jefferson County, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986