Legal Opinion

Edward v. Knapp and Evelyn Mae Knapp v. Wabash Railroad Company, a Corporation, and Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1967No. 18564PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Circuit Judge.

Appellants’ causes of action were dismissed upon motion of appellees for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the opening statement of appellants’ counsel. 1

In Best v. District of Columbia, 291 U.S. 411, 54 S.Ct. 487, 78 L.Ed. 882 (1934), the Supreme Court considered the propriety of granting a motion for a directed verdict upon the opening statement of plaintiff’s counsel. Chief Justice Hughes pertinently observed:

“There is no question as to the power of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant upon the opening statement of plaintiff’s counsel where…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Illinois Power & Light Corporation v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. Maybach v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peggy Ann Morfeld v. Dennis J. Kehm, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Jefferson County, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API