Legal Opinion
Harrell v. Spangler, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 21, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2321-KHVPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Queen E. Harrell claims that her employer, Spangler, Inc. (“Spangler”), discriminated against her on the basis of her race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Specifically, plaintiff claims that because she is African-American, defendant refused give her a raise after it promoted her in 1994 and refused to rehire her after it laid her off from her job in 1995. The matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 22) filed January 31, 1997. For reasons set…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kayhill v. Unified GovernmentDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Metzger v. City of LeawoodDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Mackley v. TW Telecom Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
- Schroder v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Stubbs v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.