Kazor v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, Chief Judge.
This matter involves the issue whether plaintiffs claim under the Michigan Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act, M.C.L.A. § 37.-1101 et seq., should be remanded to state court. For reasons stated herein, I find that this case should be remanded to Wayne County Circuit Court for resolution of the state claim.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Daniel Kazor, was employed by defendant General Motors Corporation (GM) from November 5, 1963 through December 16, 1980. While employed at GM, plaintiff was a member of defendant United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Romulus Community SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Zahnow v. Great Lakes Distributing Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Chenensky v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Tennessee Ex Rel. Pierotti v. a Parcel of Real Property Municipally Known as 777 N. White Station RoadDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1996
- Turk v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
- Samczyk v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.