Legal Opinion

Fore v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1976No. 31342PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

This appeal is from convictions on two counts of armed robbery and one count of robbery by intimidation. The crimes were committed on separate occasions against different victims. Held:.

1. There was no error in denying certain portions of appellant’s motion for discovery. There is no showing as to how his case was materially prejudiced thereby. Chenault v. State, 234 Ga. 216, 221 (215 SE2d 223) (1975). The trial court appears to have made an in camera inspection of the state’s file because it ordered the state to produce any oral or written statements of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chenault v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. State v. MiddlebrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Black v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. Cofer v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  5. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Parrish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Chappell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Lassiter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API