Legal Opinion

Smith & Hayslip v. Wilcox Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1923No. 8375PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This cause involves the proper construction of the following contract:

“This contract made and entered into on this 4th day of February, 1920, by and between Wilcox Oil Company, hereinafter called party of the first part, and Smith & Hayslip, hereinafter called party of the second part, wit-nesseth:
“That party of the first part desires a well drilled on a certain tract of land located as follows:
“Party of the second part agrees to furnish a rotary drilling rig complete for drilling said well, to perform said work in a thorough and workmanlike manner, to drill said well to a depth of. 1,800…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Knox County v. Ninth National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Borden v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. BoninCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. ShamburgerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Texas Const. Co. v. DearingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Curry v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API