Legal Opinion

Scott v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1985No. Appeal, No. 231 Miscellaneous Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Curtis Scott appeals from a denial of administrative relief by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole. The board ordered that Scott be recommitted, as a convicted parole violator, for a total of forty months backtime, reviewable in 1984. Scott *565contends, citing 37 Pa. Code §71.4(2), that the parole board failed to afford him a revocation hearing within 120 days after the conviction date. Scott also contends that the regulatory exceptions to the 120-day period do not account for all of the time between his date of conviction and the date of the parole hearing, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Grubbs v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Hammond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anam v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Edwards v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. A. Griffin v. PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. A. Griffin v. PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API