Legal Opinion
Advisory Opinion re Constitutionality of PA 1966, No 261
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1967No. Calendar No. 10, Docket No. 51,585PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*739UPON RECONSIDERATION.
2Per curiam
Responding to request of the governor, submitted to this Court pursuant to the provisions of Const 1963, art 3, § 8, five of the Justices advised April 10, 1967, that PA 1966, No 261,1 violated Const 1963, art 7, § 7. The specific words employed were that “The constitutional provision [Const 1963, art 7, § 7] is valid and, therefore PA 1966, No 261 is not.” Advisory Opinion re Constitutionality of PA 1966, No 261 (1967), 379 Mich 55, 65.
When that opinion was delivered to the governor, it was thought that the group of cases known as Moody v. Flowers; and Board of…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Moody v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dusch v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Advisory Opinion re Constitutionality of PA 1966, No. 261Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
4Cited by10 opinions
- Kizer v Livingston County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Apportionment of Wayne County Board of Commissioners—1982Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. CrossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- O'CONNOR v. EckardtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Apportionment of Wayne County Board of Commissioners—1982Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.