Legal Opinion

Kline v. Arden H. Verner Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1983No. 832PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

William B. Kline, employed as a painter, was injured in a work related fall from a ladder. He was unable to work for approximately a month and received workmen’s compensation benefits for that period. He sustained injuries to the pelvic region characterized as “priap[i]sm secondary to perineal trauma” which resulted in loss of the functional use of his penis. Because this is not among the enumerated specific losses compensable under Section 306 of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, as amended, 1 Kline commenced an action in trespass against the employer, Arden H.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Kelly v. Carborundum Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Greer v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kline v. Arden H. Verner Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Santiago v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Kuney v. PMA InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Taynton v. DershamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Pollard v. Lord Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API