Legal Opinion
Williams v. South Carolina
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided June 22, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 3:89-372-15PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has brought the present action seeking habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter is currently before the court upon cross-motions for summary judgment. The court has concluded that respondents’ motion for summary judgment should be granted. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.Proc.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 19.02(b)(2)(C), D.S.C., the matter was referred to Magistrate Henry M. Herlong, Jr., for a report and recommendation. That report and recommendation, as filed on April 11, 1990, and entered on…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992