Espinoza v. State Farm Lloyds
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION DAVID ESPINOZA, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § 1:23-CV-751-DII § STATE FARM LLOYDS, § § Defendant. § ORDER Before the Court is Defendant State Farm Lloyd’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. 37). Plaintiff David Espinoza (“Plaintiff”) filed a response, (Dkt. 40), and Defendant filed a reply, (Dkt. 42). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court will grant the motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND In his original petition, which is the live complaint…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.