Legal Opinion

Keller v. Stolzenbach

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtAohusoN, J.

Nicholas ,7. Keller, one of the plaintiffs, and Philip M. Pfeil, one of the defendants, entered into partnership on April 26, 1870, in the business of dredging and dealing in sand and gravel, the partnership lasting until April 10, 1875, when it was dissolved by-mutual consent. During the existence of the partnership Keller invented a sand and gravel separator, for which letters patent were granted to him on May 21, 1872. With his consent, and at the firm expense, the patented apparatus was put on two , boats owned by the firm, — one called the Hippopotamus, the other the Rainbow, — and was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. Homer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Mitchell v. St. Maxent's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. Badger v. BadgerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  2. Stratton v. Essex County Park CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Wilson v. Municipality of AreciboDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API