Legal Opinion

Greczyn v. Colgate-Palmolive

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 10, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEFING, J.A.D.

Plaintiff1 appeals from a trial court order dismissing her complaint for having been untimely filed. Resolution of this appeal requires that we determine whether an architect who is named as *389a defendant beyond the ten-year period permitted by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 is nonetheless subject to suit under the principles of fictitious party practice and relation back. After carefully reviewing the record in light of the contentions advanced on appeal, we conclude he is not and thus affirm.

On March 11, 1999, plaintiff tripped and fell on a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. O'CONNOR v. Abraham AltusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Farrell v. Votator Division of Chemetron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Broadway Maintenance Corp. v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greczyn v. Colgate-PalmoliveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API