Legal Opinion

Greczyn v. Colgate-Palmolive

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 21, 2005PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long

On this appeal, we address the interplay of the statute of repose protecting designers and builders, N.J.S.A. 2A.T4-1.1, and the rule governing our fictitious-party practice. R. 4:26-4. The case arose when plaintiff was injured on a staircase in a building approximately nine years after its completion. One month prior to the expiration of the ten-year statute of repose, plaintiff filed suit against the building’s owner and several fictitious defendants, identified as the designers and builders of the staircase. A year after the expiration of the ten-year period, plaintiff amended her…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. O'CONNOR v. Abraham AltusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. McGuinness v. CotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Daidone v. Buterick BulkheadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. Notte v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. R.A.C. v. P.J.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. Trinity Church v. Lawson-BellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  5. Bustamante v. Borough of ParamusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API