Legal Opinion

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Isaacson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1958No. Nos. 5742-5744PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The trial court quieted the title of ap-pellees Isaacson 'and Johnson, as the ■owner and oil and gas lessee respectively, to an undivided one-fourth interest in the minerals underlying certain land in Beaver County, Oklahoma. The unsuccessful defendants in that action have ■perfected separate appeals which present •identical issues.

The land involved is the East Half of .Section 21 and the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 6 North, Range 22 ECM. On August 13, 1941, O. F. Neal conveyed the land to Elmer Hall by deed which contained the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. McVicker v. Horn, Robinson & NathanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Tate v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Childs v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. Wood Oil Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Samuel G. Whitaker and Elizabeth Whitaker v. Texaco Inc. (Formerly Named the Texas Company), a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Layton v. Pan American Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. L. S. Youngblood and M. L. McLain v. Hughes SeewaldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  5. Harry Carlisle and Neva C. Carlisle, His Wife v. United Producing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API