Legal Opinion

HAMBRICK EX REL. HAMBRICK v. Ken-Bar Mfg. Co.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided February 28, 2002No. CIV.A. 7:01CV00177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KISER, Senior District Judge.

Before me is the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed January 11, 2002.

Plaintiff Michael Hambrick (“Ham-brick”) filed a complaint on March 13, 2001, alleging breach of implied warranty of fitness for intended purposes, negligent product design, and negligent manufacture by defendant Ken-Bar Manufacturing Company (“Ken-Bar”), a manufacturer and seller of go-karts and “fun karts” headquartered in Georgia. Hambrick alleges that design and manufacturing defects in the Ken-Bar Model D-680 “Streaker” fun kart caused him permanent physical…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Cheryl M. Hooven-Lewis v. Louis Caldera, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Benedict v. Hankook Tire Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
  2. Norris v. Excel Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
  3. Lawson v. FCA US, L.L.C.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API