Legal Opinion

Rampart Capital Corp. v. Maguire

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 29, 1998No. 04-96-01033-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREEN, Justice.

Rampart Capital Corporation (Rampart) sued Jack and Margaret Maguire to collect a promissory note. Rampart appeals the trial court's order dismissing its suit for want of prosecution and the trial court’s subsequent order denying reinstatement. Finding no error, we affirm.

Background

Rampart sued the Maguires in September 1994, and it sent them discovery in February 1995. The trial court sent a dismissal notice in May 1996, but Rampart did not take any additional action until August when it obtained a trial setting. Nonetheless, the Ma-guires moved to dismiss the suit for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. MacGregor v. RichTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ozuna v. Southwest Bio-Clinical Laboratories, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  5. Shook v. Gilmore & Tatge Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Manning v. North, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  2. Scoville v. Shaffer, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Rainbow Home Health, Inc. v. Schmidt, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. Rampart Capital Corporation v. MaguireTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cotten v. BrileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API