Legal Opinion
United States v. Harry S. Stonehill Robert P. Brooks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 20, 1996No. 95-17019PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Harry S. Stonehill and Robert P. Brooks seek to prevent the United States from selling real property in which they have an interest, pursuant to a federal tax lien. The property is held in a tax receivership, and the receiver entered into a contract to sell the property to the Town of Tiburón, California, for $6.8 million. The terms of the contract include a provision requiring ..dismissal of two state lawsuits filed against Tiburón by the receiver alleging that Tiburón depressed the value of the property through a series of illegal zoning…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Coto Settlement v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Estate of StonehillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Topworth International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.