Legal Opinion

Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Magness' Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 9, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeals from Graves Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming the judgment on one appeal and dismissing on the other appeal.

Lemuel Magness, an employe of the Cumberland Telephone and Telegraph Company, was killed by a telephone wire that had come in contact with one of the electric wires of the Mayfield ‘Water and Light Company. To recover damages for his death his administratrix brought this suit against the Cumberland Telephone and Telegraph Company and the Mayfield Water and Light Company, and on the first trial of the case the trial court directed a verdict in favor of both companies, hut after-*331wards…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowling Green Gas Light Co. v. Dean's Extx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Wight v. Cumb. Telph. & Telg. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Young's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Capital Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Davis' Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Anglea's Admx v. East Tennessee Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hotel Operating Co. v. Saunders' Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Mayfield Water & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Kreger v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API