Lamkin v. Lamkin
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent: JABAR, J.
HJELM, J.
*1278[¶ 1] Deborah E. Lamkin appeals from a judgment entered by the District Court (Portland, J. French, J. ) concluding that she did not have standing to pursue a claim for visitation rights with her grandchild pursuant to the Grandparents Visitation Act (GVA), 19-A M.R.S. §§ 1801 - 1805 (2017), and, on that basis, dismissing her petition. On appeal, Deborah contends that the court erred in its standing determination. Because Deborah failed to demonstrate standing to proceed either pursuant to the GVA or as a putative de facto parent-a claim that is suggested in some of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rideout v. RiendeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Matthew W. Pitts v. Amanda M. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Conlogue v. ConlogueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Davis v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jason Young v. Toni M. KingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Kinderhaus North LLC v. Karl NicolsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- Mark R. Martin v. Marylou E. MacMahanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- Kateryna A. Bagrii v. John P. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
- Kateryna A. Bagrii v. John P. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.